- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
JPMorgan Chase Settles Nearly $1B for Spoofing Allegations

JPMorgan Chase agreed to settle investigations into its trading practices by US authorities, as stipulated by three unnamed people with knowledge in the matter cited by Bloomberg. The investment bank accepted a record $920 million penalty for its manipulation tactics in trading metal futures and treasury securities.
The Most Expensive Spoofing to Date
Market manipulation sometimes comes with a steep price tag, in the case of JPMorgan Chase, close to $1 billion. The record penalty which could be officially announced next week is a settlement for alleged spoofing with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The investment bank will pay the mammoth fee to end the probe into allegations that traders from the precious metals and treasuries desks rigged markets.
Spoofing is an illegal practice of placing a high volume of orders without the intent to execute on them, thus moving the market in a certain direction. By creating a false demand or supply, spoofing is tricking other market participants into believing the price will move in the desired direction. The imposed financial sanction will dwarf any spoofing-related sanctions so far, as it is comparable to the sanctions imposed for the manipulation of foreign exchange markets and rigging benchmark interest rates.
These manipulation tactics have been targeted by prosecutors and regulators only recently after it had been specifically prohibited through the Dodd-Frank Act. There is a fine line between placing and removing orders and doing that with the purpose to trick other traders, and authorities are concerned the electronic trading allows market participants to place a high number of computer algorithm-generated bogus orders. Prosecutors had their hands untied after a court ruling last year which allowed them to scrutinize trading going back a decade.
Running an Enterprise Within the Bank
According to the prosecutors in the JPMorgan case, its precious metals desk was described as running an illicit enterprise for almost a decade, hence it is still unclear whether the bank would have to face additional penalties in court, despite previous spoofing cases being resolved without banks or firms having to plead guilty to criminal charges.
The investigation into the bank’s trading of treasury securities and futures followed a criminal charge raised against its former head of precious metals desk, Michael Nowak, and several other traders. They all pleaded not guilty but two of their former colleagues pleaded guilty to conspiracy claims and started cooperating. JPMorgan disclosed the separate investigation into its trading practices earlier this year, stating it was cooperating with the authorities.
The $920 million settlement consists of a $436.4 million fine, $311.7 million in restitution, and $172 million in disgorgement, but will not include any restrictions on the bank’s business practices, according to people familiar with the negotiations. The bank would admit to wrongdoing, and it will not be for the first time.
In 2015, a $550 million fine was imposed on JPMorgan Chase, when it pleaded guilty to an antitrust charge for manipulating currencies and paid the sanction to the Justice Department, as well as other penalties to regulators.
Related Topics:
Mike made his mark on the industry at a young age, consulting for companies that would later become regulators. As one of the lead editor of Gambling News, he dedicates his weekdays to this project, aiming to educate the masses on the latest developments in the gambling circuit. His expertise and passion for the industry make him an invaluable asset to our team.
Previous Article
Business
September 29, 2020
SG Boosts Betsson's US Sports Betting Push with New Deal

Next Article

Business
September 29, 2020
Conditional Approval for Tipico to Launch NJ Sports Betting
Must Read
More Articles
Industry
April 16, 2025
Tennessee SWC Asks CFTC to Ban Sports Event Contracts
Industry
February 26, 2025
Prediction Markets Grapple with Rising Scrutiny in the USA
Industry
February 13, 2025
Trump Nominates Kalshi Board Member Brian Quintenz as CFTC Chair
Sports
February 7, 2025
CFTC Hints at Potential Change in Prediction Market Rules
Sports
February 5, 2025
Robinhood Halts Super Bowl Event Contracts After CFTC Request
Industry
February 4, 2025
CFTC Issues Supplemental No-Action Letter to Kalshi
Legal
January 20, 2025
Legal Battle Between Kalshi and CFTC Intensifies
Industry
January 14, 2025
Crypto.com’s Football Contracts Face CFTC Scrutiny
Casino
December 24, 2024
JPMorgan Sells Stake in Star Entertainment as Problems Grow